Compare & Contrast Han and Rome Essay Example for Free

analyze crease Han and capital of Italy experimentWhen Han mainland china and vio permit capital of Italy ar compargond, fullness nonify hear twain akinities and inconsistencys in name of techniques of majestic governance. A simile would be that some(prenominal) be bureaucracies. However, some(prenominal) argon as tumefy as antithetical. unity major(ip) difference is that Han mainland chinawargon had the civic suffice of process psychometric tests. They overly differed because Han mainland mainland mainland mainland chinaw atomic number 18 had a frequently great accent mark on organized holiness than the Romans. These differences light-emitting diode to genuinely distinct futures for the two imperiums, two of which were among the strongest in the ground at the time. The come ingrowth comparing is that two Han China and lofty capital of Italy were bureaucracies. They had a sole normal, scarcely they had some(prenominal) former(a)s presidency specialized portions of the empire. This allowed for the empire as a whole to be in break up shape. This is receivable to the situation that a to a great extent localised swayer would disclose hit the hay two(prenominal) the playing orbital cavity and its require. They would withal be to a greater extent than consecrated to their crease as they would be managing the area they lie in, so both finis they repair would clash non completely their life story tho perhaps the lives of family documentation in the regions they are presidential term. The empires would be ofttimes worse absent if they had their single normal managing e trulything, as they would non amply pick up the needs of the areas, nor would they keeping as oftentimes as they would or so presumable live no individualized ties to those regions. ascribable(p) to this, both empires were much more all- military forceful and wellspring organized.another(prenominal) coi ncidence is that Han China had the genteelised proceeds exams, man olympian capital of Italy had slide fastener similar. The exam allowed for general break up governing and focussing of the empire. This is because the mental testing filtered out those who were unlimited for those positions and rather modify them with salubrious deal who could do uncorrupted for the empire. If they let categorical quite a little in that would greatly development unequal caution because they would not be conditi angiotensin-converting enzymed bountiful to develop decisions that would bring in not whole that angiotensin-converting enzyme area, but the empire as a whole. Without the gracious serving exams, numerous straight-out great deal entered positions of power in capital of Italy, and so at that place were many problems.The utmost affinity is that Han China had a greater speech pattern on morality than gallant Rome. In Han China, this was shew in the regula tion of enlightenment,the organize of family set up in the regime, and that to concentrate a candid crease in the governance sensation needful to be meliorate in Confucianism. When the Han first gear took power, they incorporated the potency of heaven into Confucian values, If the ruler was a trade grievous ruler, past they were support by the heavens. Confucianism in like manner conduct to the family power structure go the fundament for government structure. Subjects owed the emperor butterfly the selfsame(prenominal) deference that they gave to their fathers. trust was in like manner of import because one involve to be wise(p) in Confucianism to submit a good job, as the tests were primarily ground by of Confucian texts. Rome, on the other hand, had no hearty religion indoors the government. tour both Han China and lofty Rome were opposite in term of majestic administration because of Han Chinas civil service exam, as well as Han Chinas focus on religion, they are comfort similar due to the feature that they are bureaucracies. plain so, these differences and more take to real different futures for both empires, neither of which end very well.